From 2011 until May 12, 2014, when parents exercised an informal parenting plan (specifically if a judge had not ordered a detailed parenting plan), the paying parent was not given credit in the child support calculation for their time sharing. Child support is based on how many overnights each parent has monthly, hence the more overnights the paying parent exercises, the lower his child support. Prior to the ruling in Sherman v. Daly, courts, more specifically the Department of Revenue child support courts, would consider the informal parenting arrangements when the parties agreed it was exercised. AFter Daly, the hearing officers and Judges no longer had that discretion. I am happy to report that the legislature has corrected the problem by amending the statute to allow child support to be based on a time sharing arrangement as exercised by the parents.
Helping Good People At Their Worst Times
- Home
- →
- Family Law
- →
- The ANTI- Sherman v. Daly Amendment
The ANTI- Sherman v. Daly Amendment
On Behalf of Ferry & Ferry, P.A. | Oct 8, 2014 | Family Law, Uncategorized
Recent Posts
Archives
- June 2024
- August 2023
- November 2021
- September 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- October 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- November 2017
- September 2017
- May 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- October 2016
- June 2016
- February 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014